Swipe the map sideways to explore the full chart.
FPL xG, xA And xGI Stats
Compare goal threat, assist threat and attacking responsibility instead of judging players only by points already scored.
Attack · Map 01 Of 05
Players Offering Two Routes To Returns
Compare expected goals and assists per 90 to find players with a reliable sample offering both routes to attacking returns.
How This Map WorksEXPECTED GOALS PER 90 × EXPECTED ASSISTS PER 90 · Bubble: OFFICIAL FPL POINTS
Season xG divided by league minutes, multiplied by 90. A minimum playing-time sample is required.
Season xA divided by league minutes, multiplied by 90. This describes chance creation, not guaranteed assists.
All official FPL points earned this season.
At least 0.25 xG/90 and 0.10 xA/90, with 450+ league minutes. These are fixed attacking benchmarks; some positions and budgets have fewer matches.
Why It Is UsefulPlayers strong in both measures are less dependent on a single type of return and can offer a more reliable attacking route to FPL points.
How The Top 5 Is DerivedAmong players meeting both highlighted thresholds, rank by xGI per 90. Both a scoring and a creative route are required. Only entities inside the highlighted area enter this shortlist. Top 5 suggestions also require ownership of at least 2.5%. Fewer than five are shown when fewer qualify.
How To Use The Data
How To Use FPL xG, xA And xGI Stats
Compare goal threat, assist threat and attacking responsibility instead of judging players only by points already scored.
The maps separate finishers from creators, show which club asset owns the strongest share of attacking involvement, and adjust xGI rates for the difficulty of opponents already faced.
Player prices, points, ownership, form, transfers and expected statistics come from the official FPL data. Any TFA projection is labelled and its method is explained beside the map.